DISTRICT PROFILE · NYC COUNCIL · DISTRICT 12

Council District 12, building by building.

Every registered condominium and cooperative inside City Council District 12 — Co-op City, Williamsbridge, Olinville, Eastchester, Edenwald, Baychester, and Allerton in the northeast Bronx — pulled from the city's own tax-lot file by its council-district assignment, then joined live to the city's enforcement records. Every figure cites its source and retrieval date (2026-07-03).

39buildings
13,421homes
1,136open Class C violations
4UNSAFE facades
3vacate orders on record

THE UNIVERSE

39 buildings. One of them holds four-fifths of the homes.

13 condominiums and 26 cooperatives, holding 13,421 residential units. One record dominates: 2049 Bartow Avenue — Co-op City, the largest cooperative housing development in the United States — carries 10,914 homes on a single tax lot, 81.3% of the district's total. The other 38 buildings are a different world entirely: small co-ops and condos, most of them in the Williamsbridge–Olinville corridor.

Neighborhood (city tabulation area)CondosCo-opsTotalHomes
Williamsbridge-Olinville815231,205
Eastchester-Edenwald-Baychester358791
Allerton145303
Co-op City12311,122
District total13263913,421

Source: the city's tax-roll building file (CCNYC buildings-master), filtered on the tax-lot file's own City Council district assignment. 1 of the 39 records carries no residential-unit count and is counted as zero homes. Method details at the bottom of this page.

IMMEDIATELY-HAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS

28 buildings carry open Class C violations. 1,136 of them.

Class C is HPD's most severe routine violation class: no heat, no hot water, severe leaks, structural hazards. As of 2026-07-03, 28 of the district's 39 buildings (71.8%) carry at least one open Class C violation, and 1,136 Class C violations stand open district-wide. "Open" is HPD's own status flag; some open violations are longstanding — the count is a stock, not a flow.

Top 10 by open Class C violations

#AddressBBLNeighborhoodTypeUnitsOpen C
1 2049 BARTOW AVENUE 2051410120 Co-op City co-op 10,914 320
2 3437 EASTCHESTER ROAD 2047220012 Eastchester-Edenwald-Baychester co-op 326 222
3 3750 BRONX BOULEVARD 2046490021 Williamsbridge-Olinville co-op 43 113
4 3640 BRONX BOULEVARD 2046450019 Williamsbridge-Olinville co-op 47 67
5 720 EAST 217 STREET 2046647501 Williamsbridge-Olinville condo 24 67
6 2922 BARNES AVENUE 2045500012 Allerton co-op 129 57
7 724 EAST 221 STREET 2046687501 Williamsbridge-Olinville condo 24 39
8 665 BURKE AVENUE 2045940048 Williamsbridge-Olinville co-op 60 35
9 3650 BRONX BOULEVARD 2046450028 Williamsbridge-Olinville co-op 49 34
10 3300 PALMER AVENUE 2052280041 Eastchester-Edenwald-Baychester co-op 67 33

Scale matters here, so state it plainly: Co-op City holds 81.3% of the district's homes and accounts for 28.2% of its open Class C violations (320 of 1,136). The remaining 816 stand across 27 far smaller buildings — six of the top ten sit in the Williamsbridge–Olinville corridor alone.

Source: HPD housing-maintenance violation records — public city data, joined per building, retrieved 2026-07-03.

FACADES · VACATE ORDERS · WHO MANAGES

The rest of the enforcement record.

Facade inspections (FISP / Local Law 11)

  • 4 buildings' most recent facade status is UNSAFE; 2 more are SWARMP (safe with a repair program).
  • 5 buildings' latest facade record reads "No Report Filed."
  • Of 8 single-building lots taller than six stories, 3 have no facade filing at all (cycles 6–10).

DOB facade-compliance filing records — public city data, retrieved 2026-07-03. The 2049 Bartow Avenue lot records 250 structures under one tax lot; the lot's primary building identifier shows SAFE (cycle 9), but per-structure status cannot be resolved from it, so Co-op City is excluded from the no-filing count rather than guessed at.

City-issued vacate orders

  • 3 buildings have a vacate order on record — 3 orders, vacating a recorded 4 homes.
  • All 3 orders carry no recorded rescind date.

HPD vacate-order records — public city data, retrieved 2026-07-03.

Registration & self-managed share

  • 36 buildings hold an HPD property registration; 3 do not.
  • 3 of the 36 registered buildings (8.3%) list no managing-agent organization — each lists an individual with no firm.
  • New York licenses none of the people doing that work.

HPD property-registration records — public city data, retrieved 2026-07-03. Same method as the 775 Riverside case study.

WHY DISTRICT PROFILES

A building-level baseline for any district.

The Real Deal reported on March 31, 2026, that Council members are forming a Co-op and Condo Caucus with two stated priorities: preserving co-ops and condos as affordable homeownership, and equitable implementation of Local Law 97. As of 2026-07-03, no such caucus appears on the Council's official caucus list, and no membership or leadership has been announced. Whatever form it takes, its work needs a data floor — so CondosCoopsNYC publishes district profiles: see Congressional District NY-13 and Council District 26. The same profile can be built for any of the other 50 Council districts.

THE FULL LIST

All 39 buildings, sortable.

6 of the district's 39 buildings are profiled in the CCNYC catalog so far (2,538 citywide); the catalog is growing toward 100%. The enforcement figures below come from the live city datasets for all 39 buildings, not from the catalog. Download the full snapshot CSV ↓

Loading…
AddressZIPNeighborhoodType UnitsOpen CLife C VacateFISPMgmt

METHOD & SOURCES

How the district list was built.

  • Universe: the CCNYC master building list — 15,108 registered condominium and cooperative buildings citywide, built from the Department of City Planning's tax-lot file (PLUTO 25v4) — filtered on that file's own City Council district assignment. 39 records carry District 12.
  • Exclusions, disclosed: 57 of the 15,108 master records citywide carry no council-district assignment and are excluded from every council-district profile; none of the 57 lies in a District 12 ZIP code. 1 in-district record carries no residential-unit count and enters the homes total as zero.
  • Cross-checks: ten randomly sampled District 12 buildings — including the Co-op City lot — were tested by coordinates against the city's official council-district boundary file — ten of ten fall inside District 12. The condo/co-op split and building count were independently recomputed from the master file before publication.
  • Enforcement joins (all public city data, retrieved 2026-07-03): HPD violation records, HPD vacate-order records, DOB facade-compliance filings, and HPD property-registration records with their contact rosters, each joined per building live — not taken from the static master file. Where the live record and the master file's cached counts disagree, the live retrieval governs.
  • Limitations: HPD violation counts join at the tax-lot level, so Co-op City's 250 structures aggregate into a single record — per-tower detail is not resolvable here; facade joins use each lot's primary building identifier, which 4 of the 39 tax lots lack, and multi-building lots (3 over six stories, including Co-op City) are excluded from the no-filing count rather than guessed at; "open" violation counts are stocks, not annual flows; "no managing-agent organization" is a registration-record fact, not a claim about day-to-day operations.

Exact dataset references and reproduction steps live on the methodology page. Numbers on this page are frozen to the 2026-07-03 retrieval; they will drift as HPD and DOB records move.