Pressure Layer · Solutions Model

Every documented failure, mapped to the mechanism that fixes it.

We catalogued 81 ways New York's condo and co-op system fails the people who live in it. This page is the other half: the 61 legislative and regulatory mechanisms that close them, scored for reach and viability, sequenced by what depends on what, and checked against the bills already sitting in Albany.

81documented issues
61mechanisms
201issue-to-fix links
10bill packages
0issues with no fix

If you can carry exactly one bill

Ranked by a composite of reach, viability, how much else it unlocks, and how little it costs to stand up. The full formula is in the method note.

  1. 1

    S15 Pre-contract disclosure package

    One standard package before signing: finances, reserves, pending assessments, litigation, facade status, insurance deductible, ground lease, underlying mortgage.

    Structural 14 issues · 1 closed outright State statute — new article No one is carrying this
    87.1
    73
    32
  2. 2

    S12 Owner records access

    A statutory right to inspect financials, minutes, contracts, and bank statements on a deadline, with a per-day penalty.

    Operational 9 issues · 3 closed outright State statute — amendment Live bill exists
    77.6
    86
    8
  3. 3

    S08 Vendor kickback prohibition and conflict disclosure

    Ban undisclosed compensation from vendors to managers and board members; require an annual signed conflicts disclosure.

    Structural 9 issues · 5 closed outright State statute — new article No one is carrying this
    92.3
    63
    0
  4. 4

    S14 Reserve study and funding plan

    A credentialed multi-decade reserve study, a funding plan tied to it, and disclosure of the funding percentage.

    Operational 4 issues · 1 closed outright State statute — amendment Live bill exists
    59.4
    81
    32
  5. 5

    S03 Private right of action with fee-shifting

    Give a unit owner a direct statutory claim for governance violations, with attorney fees to the prevailing owner.

    Keystone 2 issues · 0 closed outright State statute — new article No one is carrying this
    41.5
    56
    100

The keystones

Some mechanisms are worth little on their own and make everything else work. A registration statute with no administrative forum is adjudicated at civil-litigation speed, which means a $1,000 penalty costs more to pursue than it returns, which means it is never pursued. These are the provisions the rest of the program leans on.

Keystone

S03 Private right of action with fee-shifting

Give a unit owner a direct statutory claim for governance violations, with attorney fees to the prevailing owner.

Required by
12 other mechanisms
Downstream reach
13 in the tree
Viability
56 / 100
Keystone

S01 Common Interest Community Division

Create one state office with standing jurisdiction over condominiums and cooperatives after the sponsor leaves.

Required by
3 other mechanisms
Downstream reach
3 in the tree
Viability
57 / 100
Keystone

S02 Administrative forum and timelines for enforcement

Route enforcement through SAPA Article 3 with commencement and decision deadlines, instead of leaving it to Supreme Court.

Required by
2 other mechanisms
Downstream reach
4 in the tree
Viability
76 / 100
Foundational

S27 Agency data keyed to buildings

Require HPD, DOB, DOF, and 311 to tag common interest communities and key records to BBL so patterns are visible.

Required by
2 other mechanisms
Downstream reach
2 in the tree
Viability
71 / 100
Foundational

S05 Managing agent licensure

License the people running multi-million-dollar residential budgets: exam, bond, insurance, continuing education, and a disciplinary body.

Required by
2 other mechanisms
Downstream reach
0 in the tree
Viability
62 / 100
Keystone

S04 Ombudsperson and complaint intake

A named public office that takes owner complaints, publishes what it receives, and routes cases without requiring a lawyer.

Required by
1 other mechanisms
Downstream reach
0 in the tree
Viability
75 / 100

All 61 mechanisms

Filter, sort, and open any row for the full case — what it does, why it works, the strongest argument against it, and the answer to that argument.

Code Mechanism Tier Issues Reach Viability Cost / risk Unlocks Composite Priority

0 of 61 shown · click any row for the full case

Ten packages, three phases

Mechanisms do not travel alone. Each package below is a coherent ask with a committee route and a stated fiscal posture, sequenced so that nothing is scheduled ahead of something it depends on — a constraint the model checks rather than assumes.

Phase 1 This session

P1

The Accountability Floor

Licensure, a forum, a public registry, and segregated funds

S.71 already carries the registration core. This package is the A-amendment set that converts a registration statute into an enforceable licensure regime: add the exam, bond, and insurance floor, designate the administrative forum, make the registry public, and keep the fund-segregation provision that is already the strongest text in the bill.

16issues reached
6mechanisms
78avg viability
62weakest link
  1. anchor S05 Managing agent licensure The existing S.71 core, strengthened to a full licensure floor.
  2. core S02 Administrative forum and timelines for enforcement The G12/G13 fix. Without it the rest of the package is unenforceable at speed.
  3. core S06 Public managing agent registry Public registry access — the provision the industry resists hardest inside an otherwise acceptable bill.
  4. core S49 Fund segregation and bonding Already drafted in S.71 §448(11); keep it intact.
  5. supporting S12 Owner records access Records access is what makes the licensee record checkable at building level.
  6. core S54 Owner right to fire the managing agent Already drafted in S.8912 and out of committee — the fastest-moving accountability mechanism available.
The ask

Carry the A-amendment to S.71 covering the exam requirement, the bond and E&O floor, public registry access, and a new subdivision designating SAPA Article 3 procedure for both disciplinary and Attorney General enforcement.

Route: Senate Judiciary (S.71 sits here); Assembly Housing for the companion

Fiscal: Fee-funded from registration; no general fund appropriation required

P2

Owner Right to Know

Records access, buyer disclosure, minutes, and an independent audit

Every accountability mechanism downstream depends on an owner or a buyer being able to see the document. This package is the disclosure layer, and it is the cheapest, most owner-visible group in the catalog. A.1505 is the existing vehicle for the records half.

27issues reached
7mechanisms
73.8avg viability
57weakest link
  1. anchor S15 Pre-contract disclosure package The pre-contract package is the highest-visibility item in the catalog.
  2. core S12 Owner records access A.1505 is the live vehicle for this half.
  3. core S48 Minutes content and distribution standard A minutes content standard is cheap and precise.
  4. core S13 Independent annual audit Independent audit above a threshold; review-level below it.
  5. supporting S33 Underlying mortgage disclosure Underlying mortgage disclosure is the largest single omission in cooperative sales.
  6. supporting S34 Ground lease reset disclosure and guardrails Ground lease reset mechanics belong in the same disclosure instrument.
  7. supporting S32 Master policy deductible allocation Master policy deductible allocation is a disclosure item and a default rule at once.
The ask

Carry A.1505 with an expanded records schedule, and pair it with a standardized pre-contract disclosure package modeled on peer-state resale certificates.

Route: Assembly Housing; Senate Housing, Construction and Community Development

Fiscal: No appropriation; compliance cost falls on associations and is collation, not creation

P3

Money in the Building

Kickback prohibition, competitive bidding, reserve study, classification standard

The extraction documented in this catalog runs through vendor selection and cost classification, not through theft. Attack the referral payment, require the bid file, mandate the reserve study, and fix the capital-versus-repair standard, and the three main routes close together.

16issues reached
7mechanisms
73.4avg viability
63weakest link
  1. anchor S08 Vendor kickback prohibition and conflict disclosure The referral-payment prohibition is the load-bearing provision.
  2. core S11 Competitive bidding above a threshold The bid file is the document any later review needs.
  3. core S14 Reserve study and funding plan S.7600 / A.8945 already carries the study mandate.
  4. supporting S35 Capital versus repair classification standard Classification standard closes the route around consent thresholds.
  5. optional amendment S16 Owner vote on extraordinary expenses Consent thresholds belong here or in P4; do not carry them twice.
  6. optional amendment S58 Credential the reserve study specialists Carry only alongside the reserve study mandate; it is meaningless alone.
  7. core S60 A benchmark for whether a reserve is adequate Carry with the reserve study mandate; the two are one instrument and neither works alone.
The ask

Carry a vendor conflicts and competitive bidding bill, and support S.7600 / A.8945 on the reserve study with a funding-percentage disclosure amendment.

Route: Senate Judiciary; Assembly Housing

Fiscal: No appropriation; the reserve study cost falls on associations on a multi-year cycle

P5

The Forum

Private right of action, mediation, collection protections, arbitration ban

A right with no affordable route to assert it is not a right. This package builds the routes: a statutory claim with fee-shifting for the case worth litigating, a mediation track for the case that is not, and procedural protections in the collection actions that currently default at high rates.

12issues reached
7mechanisms
68.8avg viability
56weakest link
  1. anchor S03 Private right of action with fee-shifting One-way fee-shifting is the provision that makes small claims rational to bring.
  2. core S24 Low-cost dispute resolution program A forum priced to the dispute, for the case not worth litigating.
  3. core S25 Notice and default protections in collection actions Sworn itemization before default judgment.
  4. core S26 Collection legal fee limits Proportional caps on collection legal fees.
  5. supporting S21 Retaliation bar and anti-SLAPP extension Retaliation bar for the owner who used any of the above.
  6. optional amendment S23 Ban on forced arbitration in governing documents Carries genuine Federal Arbitration Act preemption risk; sever if it threatens the package.
  7. supporting S56 Receivership for governance collapse Receivership is the structural remedy at the end of the escalation ladder.
The ask

Carry the private right of action with one-way fee-shifting and the low-cost dispute resolution program as a paired bill.

Route: Senate Judiciary; Assembly Judiciary

Fiscal: Mediation program requires a standup appropriation; the private right of action requires none

P6

Facade and Safety Integrity

Inspector independence, appeal rights, cycle alignment, elevator and vault accountability

The facade inspection regime is where a safety mandate became a revenue system. These are city-level fixes that do not wait on Albany: separate the inspector from the contractor, give buildings an appeal from an unsafe designation, align the inspection cycles, and start measuring elevator outage duration.

10issues reached
7mechanisms
62.7avg viability
55weakest link
  1. anchor S09 Facade inspector independence QEWI independence certification.
  2. core S30 Facade designation appeal and cure path Administrative appeal and cure path from an unsafe designation.
  3. core S29 Parapet and gas inspection alignment Consolidated parapet, gas, and facade cycle filing.
  4. core S28 Elevator outage and violation accountability Elevator outage duration reporting.
  5. supporting S52 Sidewalk vault responsibility clarification Sidewalk vault responsibility allocation.
  6. supporting S51 Battery storage standards and insurance continuity Battery storage standard; the insurance half may need to move at state level.
  7. supporting S42 Short-term rental enforcement cost allocation Short-term rental enforcement cost allocation is a city local law on the same track.
The ask

Introduce a local law package covering QEWI independence certification, an administrative appeal from unsafe designations, consolidated inspection cycle filing, and elevator outage duration reporting.

Route: NYC Council Committee on Housing and Buildings

Fiscal: Administrable within existing DOB fee structure

P9

The Registry

State registry, agency data keying, ombudsperson, the division itself

New York cannot regulate what it cannot address. This package builds the list, the data keys, the intake channel, and the agency, in that order. It is the least glamorous group here and the one that makes every other package enforceable at scale, which is why it sits in phase one: the public registry in P1 and the elevator tracking in P6 both depend on the data keying delivered here, and neither can be sequenced ahead of it.

16issues reached
7mechanisms
71.1avg viability
57weakest link
  1. anchor S01 Common Interest Community Division The division. Everything else in this package administers through it.
  2. core S07 Statewide condo and co-op registry The statewide registry — the addressable list nothing else can be built without.
  3. core S27 Agency data keyed to buildings Agency data keyed to buildings, at city level.
  4. core S04 Ombudsperson and complaint intake Ombudsperson and complaint intake.
  5. supporting S06 Public managing agent registry The agent registry consumes the same data infrastructure.
  6. core S57 Condition the tax abatement on compliance Conditioning the abatement is how the registry gets populated without an enforcement budget.
  7. supporting S61 Make Reserve Fund Law compliance checkable A compliance field on a record HPD already holds.
The ask

Carry the common interest community registry and ombudsperson as a single bill, with the division established as its administering body.

Route: Senate Housing; Assembly Housing

Fiscal: Fee-funded registration offsets standup cost; the ombudsperson requires an appropriation

Phase 2 Next session

P10

Everyday Owner Protections

Fee schedules, transfer fees, sublet rules, first-refusal deadlines, privilege, whistleblowers

These are the retail-politics items: individually small, universally experienced, and each one a constituent-service story. None of them restructures anything, which is exactly why they move when the structural bills stall. Every one of them depends on the private right of action delivered in P5.

13issues reached
6mechanisms
77.5avg viability
71weakest link
  1. anchor S19 Published and justified fee schedule Every owner has paid one of these fees. Highest retail value per drafting hour.
  2. core S20 Transfer fee authorization and disclosure Reconcile the fee definitions against S19 before drafting; the two overlap on transfer fees.
  3. core S39 Sublet and rental restriction standards Uniform application of sublet restrictions.
  4. core S40 Right of first refusal limits First-refusal decision deadline and same-terms requirement.
  5. supporting S22 Limits on common interest privilege The fiduciary exception to common interest privilege.
  6. supporting S47 Whistleblower protection Whistleblower protection for the reporter inside the building.
The ask

Carry an owner protections omnibus covering published cost-related fee schedules, transfer fee authorization and disclosure, uniform sublet standards, first-refusal deadlines, the fiduciary exception to privilege, and whistleblower protection.

Route: Senate Judiciary; Assembly Housing

Fiscal: No appropriation

P4

Consent and Elections

Election integrity, spending thresholds, commercial vote limits, indemnification limits

Almost every governance defect in the catalog is downstream of who sits on the board and what they can spend without asking. S.5089 already passed the Senate on the spending half; the election half has a complete drafting model in peer-state law.

21issues reached
8mechanisms
72avg viability
56weakest link
  1. anchor S17 Election and proxy integrity standards Written rules, independent inspector, secret ballot, proxy limits.
  2. core S16 Owner vote on extraordinary expenses S.5089 passed the Senate in 2026 — move the Assembly companion.
  3. core S41 Commercial unit governance limits Commercial vote weight tied to common charge share.
  4. supporting S53 Indemnification and insurance limits No association-funded indemnification after an adjudicated bad-faith finding.
  5. supporting S10 Codified board fiduciary duty The business judgment carve-back is what produces that finding.
  6. core S38 Admissions transparency Admissions decisions are consent decisions taken about a person rather than a budget; same accountability logic.
  7. supporting S37 Privatization vote integrity Privatization votes are the highest-stakes consent event in the catalog.
  8. supporting S55 Board member certification and training Certification is what a codified fiduciary duty attaches to.
The ask

Move A.5227 to match the Senate-passed S.5089, and carry an election-integrity bill covering written rules, an independent inspector, secret ballots, and proxy limits.

Route: Assembly Housing (A.5227 pending); Senate Housing

Fiscal: No appropriation

P7

Sponsor and New Construction Accountability

Transition reform, warranty timing, inspection rights, offering plan docket

The sponsor controls the board during exactly the period when construction defects would be found, and the warranty and escrow clocks run out on the purchasers who inherit the building. Move the clocks to transition and let the buyer inspect.

21issues reached
4mechanisms
66.1avg viability
46weakest link
  1. anchor S18 Sponsor transition reform Voting caps, warranty from transition, escrow release conditions.
  2. core S46 New construction inspection right Purchaser inspection right, non-waivable.
  3. core S50 Offering plan docket transparency Public offering plan and amendment docket.
  4. supporting S15 Pre-contract disclosure package The disclosure package is where transition facts reach the buyer.
The ask

Carry a sponsor transition bill covering unsold-unit voting caps, warranty running from transition, escrow release conditions, and a purchaser inspection right.

Route: Senate Judiciary; Assembly Housing

Fiscal: No appropriation; the offering plan docket is administrable under existing GBL 352-e authority

Phase 3 Build toward

P8

Tax and Subsidy Equity

Assessment methodology, subsidy accountability, amenity parity, exemption continuity

This is the largest-dollar and least-feasible group in the catalog, and it is kept in the model precisely because the inequity is documented. The exemption-continuity piece is severable and could pass on its own facts in any session.

14issues reached
6mechanisms
51.9avg viability
41weakest link
  1. anchor S43 Assessment and abatement equity Assessment methodology and subsidy accountability.
  2. core S44 Amenity access parity Amenity access parity conditioned on continuing benefit.
  3. supporting S45 Multi-address and tax lot workaround closure Structure-based threshold definition.
  4. optional amendment S36 Article XI exemption continuity Sever and carry independently — it passes on its own facts.
  5. supporting S31 Emissions penalty passthrough transparency Emissions penalty disclosure sits alongside the tax exposure.
  6. optional amendment S59 Adopt the uniform act instead of patching The wholesale alternative. Recorded so the incremental path is visibly a choice.
The ask

Sever the HDFC Article XI notice-and-cure provision and carry it independently; keep assessment reform as a longer-horizon ask.

Route: Assembly Real Property Taxation; Senate Budget and Revenue; NYC Council Finance

Fiscal: Assessment reform carries significant revenue exposure; notice-and-cure carries almost none

Reach against viability

Every mechanism plotted. The axes are the model averages, so the quadrants are relative to this program, not to some external standard. Top-right is where a sponsor with limited floor time should look first.

Carry now Build the coalition Quick win Long game Viability → Reach → S15 — Pre-contract disclosure package Reach 87.1 · Viability 73 · 14 issues S12 — Owner records access Reach 77.6 · Viability 86 · 9 issues S08 — Vendor kickback prohibition and conflict disclosure Reach 92.3 · Viability 63 · 9 issues S14 — Reserve study and funding plan Reach 59.4 · Viability 81 · 4 issues S03 — Private right of action with fee-shifting Reach 41.5 · Viability 56 · 2 issues S17 — Election and proxy integrity standards Reach 64.9 · Viability 81 · 7 issues S27 — Agency data keyed to buildings Reach 47.9 · Viability 71 · 5 issues S01 — Common Interest Community Division Reach 53.9 · Viability 57 · 3 issues S11 — Competitive bidding above a threshold Reach 59.3 · Viability 77 · 7 issues S19 — Published and justified fee schedule Reach 60 · Viability 78 · 5 issues S04 — Ombudsperson and complaint intake Reach 42.4 · Viability 75 · 3 issues S50 — Offering plan docket transparency Reach 48.4 · Viability 76 · 5 issues S48 — Minutes content and distribution standard Reach 57.4 · Viability 78 · 4 issues S13 — Independent annual audit Reach 61.3 · Viability 66 · 8 issues S09 — Facade inspector independence Reach 70.4 · Viability 55 · 4 issues S16 — Owner vote on extraordinary expenses Reach 53.9 · Viability 79 · 3 issues S06 — Public managing agent registry Reach 48.9 · Viability 74 · 3 issues S02 — Administrative forum and timelines for enforcement Reach 28.3 · Viability 76 · 3 issues S21 — Retaliation bar and anti-SLAPP extension Reach 48.9 · Viability 82 · 3 issues S60 — A benchmark for whether a reserve is adequate Reach 51.5 · Viability 77 · 3 issues S54 — Owner right to fire the managing agent Reach 56.3 · Viability 72 · 4 issues S36 — Article XI exemption continuity Reach 47.1 · Viability 83 · 2 issues S05 — Managing agent licensure Reach 44.9 · Viability 62 · 2 issues S57 — Condition the tax abatement on compliance Reach 49.5 · Viability 74 · 4 issues S10 — Codified board fiduciary duty Reach 52.5 · Viability 71 · 4 issues S61 — Make Reserve Fund Law compliance checkable Reach 43.1 · Viability 72 · 3 issues S47 — Whistleblower protection Reach 37.4 · Viability 85 · 2 issues S25 — Notice and default protections in collection actions Reach 42 · Viability 78 · 2 issues S18 — Sponsor transition reform Reach 68.6 · Viability 46 · 6 issues S33 — Underlying mortgage disclosure Reach 49.6 · Viability 69 · 2 issues S07 — Statewide condo and co-op registry Reach 36.6 · Viability 75 · 2 issues S40 — Right of first refusal limits Reach 32 · Viability 89 · 1 issues S55 — Board member certification and training Reach 38 · Viability 84 · 4 issues S38 — Admissions transparency Reach 60.6 · Viability 57 · 5 issues S22 — Limits on common interest privilege Reach 46.5 · Viability 71 · 3 issues S24 — Low-cost dispute resolution program Reach 44 · Viability 75 · 3 issues S39 — Sublet and rental restriction standards Reach 41.4 · Viability 73 · 2 issues S26 — Collection legal fee limits Reach 54.5 · Viability 58 · 3 issues S28 — Elevator outage and violation accountability Reach 46.4 · Viability 67 · 1 issues S49 — Fund segregation and bonding Reach 34.4 · Viability 81 · 1 issues S43 — Assessment and abatement equity Reach 74.9 · Viability 42 · 6 issues S29 — Parapet and gas inspection alignment Reach 39.6 · Viability 72 · 2 issues S30 — Facade designation appeal and cure path Reach 40 · Viability 72 · 1 issues S31 — Emissions penalty passthrough transparency Reach 43.5 · Viability 65 · 1 issues S20 — Transfer fee authorization and disclosure Reach 34.4 · Viability 77 · 1 issues S56 — Receivership for governance collapse Reach 50 · Viability 64 · 4 issues S35 — Capital versus repair classification standard Reach 34.9 · Viability 72 · 3 issues S46 — New construction inspection right Reach 53.5 · Viability 54 · 2 issues S34 — Ground lease reset disclosure and guardrails Reach 40 · Viability 65 · 1 issues S41 — Commercial unit governance limits Reach 44.5 · Viability 61 · 3 issues S42 — Short-term rental enforcement cost allocation Reach 40 · Viability 64 · 1 issues S53 — Indemnification and insurance limits Reach 36 · Viability 67 · 1 issues S32 — Master policy deductible allocation Reach 42.6 · Viability 57 · 2 issues S51 — Battery storage standards and insurance continuity Reach 41.6 · Viability 60 · 1 issues S44 — Amenity access parity Reach 46.9 · Viability 53 · 3 issues S58 — Credential the reserve study specialists Reach 20.5 · Viability 80 · 2 issues S23 — Ban on forced arbitration in governing documents Reach 30.4 · Viability 70 · 1 issues S37 — Privatization vote integrity Reach 36 · Viability 56 · 1 issues S52 — Sidewalk vault responsibility clarification Reach 30 · Viability 63 · 1 issues S45 — Multi-address and tax lot workaround closure Reach 22 · Viability 65 · 1 issues S59 — Adopt the uniform act instead of patching Reach 41 · Viability 41 · 3 issues
  • T0 Keystone — Carry these first or the rest of the package underdelivers. A keystone alone changes little; a package without one changes nothing.
  • T1 Foundational — Cheap relative to impact and rarely controversial on its own terms. Natural first-session vehicle.
  • T2 Structural — Where the organized opposition concentrates. Needs T1 identifiers to be enforceable.
  • T3 Operational — High owner-visible benefit per unit of political cost. Good amendment material.
  • T4 Remedial — Retail-politics value; each one is a constituent-service story. Weak without T0 forum.
  • Dot size is the number of issues the mechanism touches.

What depends on what

Read this as a warning list. Everything indented under a mechanism is inoperative, or enforceable only at a speed and cost that defeats it, until that mechanism exists. The model verifies this graph is acyclic and that no package schedules a mechanism ahead of its prerequisite.

S02 Administrative forum and timelines for enforcement prerequisite
S05 Managing agent licensure
S06 Public managing agent registry
S49 Fund segregation and bonding
S08 Vendor kickback prohibition and conflict disclosure
S27 Agency data keyed to buildings prerequisite
S06 Public managing agent registry
S28 Elevator outage and violation accountability
S01 Common Interest Community Division prerequisite
S04 Ombudsperson and complaint intake
S24 Low-cost dispute resolution program
S07 Statewide condo and co-op registry
S03 Private right of action with fee-shifting prerequisite
S10 Codified board fiduciary duty
S11 Competitive bidding above a threshold
S12 Owner records access
S13 Independent annual audit
S35 Capital versus repair classification standard
S17 Election and proxy integrity standards
S19 Published and justified fee schedule
S20 Transfer fee authorization and disclosure
S22 Limits on common interest privilege
S39 Sublet and rental restriction standards
S40 Right of first refusal limits
S48 Minutes content and distribution standard
S53 Indemnification and insurance limits
S14 Reserve study and funding plan prerequisite
S58 Credential the reserve study specialists
S60 A benchmark for whether a reserve is adequate

The coverage matrix

Every documented issue and the mechanisms that reach it. The bold chip is the headline fix; the rest are secondary contributions. Where the headline fix only mitigates, the model requires us to name what is left over — you will see that stated rather than smoothed away.

financial abuse 11 issues · avg severity 3.82
93% avg coverage
governance defect 20 issues · avg severity 3.45
95% avg coverage
regulatory gap 35 issues · avg severity 3.66
96% avg coverage
legal loophole 6 issues · avg severity 3.5
97% avg coverage
safety issue 2 issues · avg severity 3
100% avg coverage
scam pattern 7 issues · avg severity 3.57
100% avg coverage
5
421-a Phase-Out Creates a Permanent Carrying-Cost Cliff for Affordable & Mixed-Income Owners financial abuse · closed in combination
S43 mitigates S15 discloses
5
421-a Public Subsidy Substantially Exceeds Affordable Housing Delivered financial abuse · closed in combination
S43 mitigates S44 mitigates
5
Co-op Underlying Mortgage Is Hidden Leverage Buyers Cannot See regulatory gap · closed by design
S33 closes S15 discloses S13 discloses
5
LL11 Engineers Can Refer and Profit From Contractors They Recommend regulatory gap · closed by design
S09 closes S08 mitigates S11 mitigates
5
LL97 Emissions Fines Pass Through to Unit Owners with No Cost Controls financial abuse · closed in combination
S31 mitigates S35 mitigates S15 discloses
5
Local Law 11 Has No Cost-Reasonableness Review regulatory gap · closed by design
S09 closes S11 mitigates S14 mitigates S16 mitigates
5
Managing Agents Operate Without State Licensure regulatory gap · closed by design
S05 closes S54 mitigates S06 enables S02 enables
5
No NY State Agency Has Primary Jurisdiction Over Condo/Co-op Governance regulatory gap · closed by design
S01 closes S59 mitigates S04 mitigates S56 mitigates S02 enables
5
NYC Multifamily (Class 2) Carries ~5x the Effective Property Tax Rate of Single-Family (Class 1) financial abuse · closed in combination
S43 mitigates S57 discloses
5
Sponsor Construction Defaults Trigger Escrow Release Gaps regulatory gap · closed by design
S18 closes S50 discloses
5
Managing Agents Receive Undisclosed Kickbacks From Vendors scam pattern · closed by design
S08 closes S11 mitigates S54 mitigates S13 discloses
4
Short-Term Rental Enforcement Burden Shifted to Buildings regulatory gap · closed by design
S42 closes
4
Board Counsel Is Typically Referred by the Managing Agent governance defect · closed in combination
S22 mitigates S08 mitigates S10 mitigates S55 enables
4
Board Fiduciary Duty Has No Enforcement Mechanism regulatory gap · closed by design
S10 closes S55 mitigates S59 mitigates S56 mitigates S03 enables S02 enables
4
Board Indemnification Clauses Shield Directors from Personal Liability legal loophole · closed by design
S53 closes S10 mitigates
4
Boards Reclassify Repairs as Capital Improvements to Shift Tax Burden financial abuse · closed by design
S35 closes S13 mitigates S14 mitigates S16 mitigates
4
Co-op Admission Rejections Are Shielded from Fair Housing Scrutiny by BJR legal loophole · closed in combination
S38 mitigates S10 mitigates
4
Common-Interest Privilege Shields Defamatory Board Communications legal loophole · closed by design
S22 closes S21 mitigates S03 enables
4
Board Election Procedures Are Set by Bylaws and Often Opaque governance defect · closed by design
S17 closes S12 discloses S55 enables
4
No Mandatory Financial Disclosure to Prospective Buyers regulatory gap · closed by design
S15 closes S13 mitigates S60 mitigates S33 discloses
4
Annual Financial Statements Are Withheld From Unit Owners governance defect · closed by design
S12 closes S13 mitigates S57 mitigates S15 discloses
4
FISP "Unsafe" Designation Causes Market Stigma With No Expedited Appeal regulatory gap · closed by design
S30 closes S09 mitigates S56 mitigates S15 discloses
4
Ground Lease Condos Can See 400% Rent Resets Buyers Never Saw Coming regulatory gap · closed by design
S34 closes S15 discloses
4
HDFC Co-ops Lose Article XI Tax Exemption When Owners Earn Too Much regulatory gap · closed by design
S36 closes
4
Insurance Broker Selection Is Captured by Managing Agents scam pattern · closed by design
S08 closes S11 mitigates
4
Law Firms Bill Common-Charge Collections Per-File With No Caps financial abuse · closed by design
S26 closes S25 mitigates S12 discloses
4
Board Counsel Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure Is Inadequate governance defect · closed by design
S08 closes S22 mitigates S26 mitigates
4
Local Law 11 Pipeline Captures Engineers, Contractors, and Boards scam pattern · closed by design
S09 closes S08 mitigates S11 mitigates
4
Martin Act Enforcement Ends When Sponsor Sells Out regulatory gap · closed by design
S01 closes S18 mitigates S59 mitigates S50 discloses
4
Condo Master Policy Deductibles Are Pushed Onto Unit Owners financial abuse · closed by design
S32 closes S15 discloses
4
Board Meeting Minutes Are Not Distributed to Unit Owners governance defect · closed by design
S48 closes S12 mitigates
4
Board and Managing Agent Control Minutes Used Against Unit Owners governance defect · closed by design
S48 closes S12 mitigates S55 enables
4
Mitchell-Lama Privatization Votes Can Be Manipulated by Sponsor Interests governance defect · closed by design
S37 closes S17 mitigates
4
No Mandatory Independent New-Construction Inspection That Hands the Buyer a Defect List regulatory gap · closed by design
S46 closes S18 mitigates
4
No Standard of Reserve Adequacy — and No One Reviews It regulatory gap · closed in combination
S14 mitigates S60 mitigates S15 discloses S61 discloses S13 discloses S58 enables
4
Reserve Studies Are Not Required for NYC Condos and Co-ops regulatory gap · closed by design
S14 closes S57 mitigates S58 enables S60 enables
4
Boards Use Right of First Refusal to Block or Price-Manipulate Sales governance defect · closed by design
S40 closes S38 mitigates
4
Sponsor-Retained Unsold Shares Distort Board Voting governance defect · closed by design
S18 closes S17 mitigates
4
Sponsor Construction Warranties Expire Before Defects Surface regulatory gap · closed by design
S18 closes S46 mitigates
3
NYC 311 Has No Complaint Category for Managing Agent Misconduct regulatory gap · closed by design
S27 closes S04 mitigates
3
421-a Tax Abatement Transitions Are Opaque to Buyers regulatory gap · closed in combination
S43 mitigates S15 discloses
3
Co-op Admissions Packages Demand Excessive Private Financial Data governance defect · closed by design
S38 closes
3
Admissions Interview and Reference Requirements Function as Soft Discrimination Screens governance defect · closed by design
S38 closes
3
AG REFB Complaint Disposition Rate Is Not Published regulatory gap · closed by design
S50 closes S01 mitigates
3
Alteration Agreement Fees Function as Revenue Generators financial abuse · closed in combination
S19 mitigates S08 mitigates S11 mitigates
3
Amenity Fee Structures Function as Post-2015 "Soft" Poor Doors scam pattern · closed in combination
S44 mitigates S19 mitigates
3
Bulk Cable / Internet Contracts Hide Kickbacks to Boards/Agents scam pattern · closed by design
S08 closes S12 discloses
3
Residential Owners Have No Effective Recourse Against Commercial Co-Tenants governance defect · partial
S41 mitigates
3
Commercial Unit Owners Have Outsized Voting Power in Mixed Buildings governance defect · closed by design
S41 closes S17 mitigates
3
E-Bike Lithium Battery Fire Risk Not Addressed in Insurance or Bylaws safety issue · closed by design
S51 closes S32 mitigates
3
Elevator Violation Repeat Offenders Are Not Tracked Across Buildings regulatory gap · closed by design
S28 closes S56 mitigates S27 enables
3
Flip Taxes Are Imposed Without Standard Disclosure governance defect · closed by design
S20 closes S15 discloses
3
Fuel Supplier Selection Hides Kickback Layers scam pattern · closed by design
S08 closes S11 mitigates
3
Gas Line Inspection Records Are Hard to Access safety issue · closed by design
S29 closes S27 discloses
3
HPD Violations Are Not Aggregated by Managing Agent regulatory gap · closed by design
S27 closes S06 mitigates S61 discloses
3
J-51 Compliance Failures Trigger Retroactive Tax and Rent Issues regulatory gap · closed in combination
S43 mitigates S36 mitigates
3
Limited Common Element vs. General Common Element Classification Is Gamed governance defect · closed by design
S41 closes S15 discloses
3
No Prohibition on Managing Agents Commingling Building Operating Accounts scam pattern · closed by design
S49 closes S13 mitigates S54 mitigates S05 enables
3
Buyers Are Forced Into Arbitration Through Hidden Clauses regulatory gap · closed by design
S23 closes S24 mitigates
3
Multiple Street Addresses on One Tax Lot Enable Building-Within-a-Building Segregation legal loophole · closed by design
S45 closes
3
NYC Has No Master List of All Condos and Co-ops regulatory gap · closed by design
S07 closes S27 mitigates S57 mitigates
3
RPL 339-w Predates the Internet: No Right to Receive Condo Financials Electronically regulatory gap · closed by design
S12 closes S13 mitigates S15 discloses
3
NY Has No Mandatory Mediation for Condo/Co-op Disputes regulatory gap · closed by design
S24 closes S04 mitigates
3
No Public Registry of Managing Agents or Buildings They Manage regulatory gap · closed by design
S06 closes S54 mitigates S07 enables
3
Pro-Se Unit Owners Lose by Default in Common-Charge Collection Actions legal loophole · closed by design
S25 closes S24 mitigates S26 mitigates
3
Offering Plan Amendments Are Filed but Not Audited regulatory gap · closed by design
S50 closes S18 mitigates
3
Offering Plans Are Not Publicly Searchable Online regulatory gap · closed by design
S50 closes S61 mitigates S15 discloses
3
Officer Removal Procedures Are Vague and Easily Manipulated governance defect · closed in combination
S17 mitigates S48 mitigates
3
Parapet Inspection Law (LL126) Has No Public Database regulatory gap · closed by design
S29 closes
3
Pre-2015 "Poor Doors" Buildings Are Locked Into the Old Architecture regulatory gap · closed by design
S44 closes
3
Proxy Vote Procedures Allow Manipulation by Boards governance defect · closed by design
S17 closes
3
Rental Restrictions Can Be Imposed Retroactively governance defect · closed by design
S39 closes S38 mitigates
3
Sidewalk Vault Repair Responsibility Is Unclear and Costly regulatory gap · closed by design
S52 closes
3
Boards Use Litigation as a Retaliation Tool Against Dissenting Owners legal loophole · closed by design
S21 closes S47 mitigates
3
"Assessment by Resolution" vs. "By Amendment" Distinction Enables Assessment Abuse governance defect · closed by design
S16 closes S35 mitigates S48 discloses
3
Sublet Fees Are Imposed Without Disclosure or Cap financial abuse · closed in combination
S19 mitigates S39 mitigates
3
Property Tax Protest Process Favors Sponsors and Outside Experts regulatory gap · closed in combination
S43 mitigates S12 discloses
3
Unit Owner Contact Lists Are Restricted From Other Unit Owners governance defect · closed by design
S12 closes S17 mitigates
3
Board Members Who Report Misconduct Have No Whistleblower Protection regulatory gap · closed by design
S47 closes S21 mitigates
2
Move-In/Move-Out Fees Are Imposed Without Cap or Justification financial abuse · closed by design
S19 closes
2
Pet Deposits and Restrictions Are Imposed Without Cap or Standard financial abuse · closed by design
S19 closes

The bills we have actually written

A model that names mechanisms and never drafts one is a critique. These are 10 complete drafts — sponsor's memorandum, operative text in legislative form, an explicit account of what each one deliberately does not do, the open questions a counsel's office would raise, and an appendix verifying every citation. None has a bill number and none has a sponsor, and neither fact is hidden anywhere in them.

NYC Council S09 S28 S29 S30 S52 No sponsor

Building Safety Integrity Act

The person who decides how much facade work your building needs should not be paid by the company that does it.

8 issues reached 7 citations verified 0 corrections 7 open questions

Amends NYC Administrative Code (new sections 28-302.6, 28-302.7, 28-301.4, 28-304.4)

Read the draft →
State legislature S15 S43 No sponsor

Mixed-Income 421-a Affordability Disclosure Act

Tell the buyer what the unit will cost to carry after the tax exemption ends.

18 issues reached 6 citations verified 6 corrections 5 open questions

Amends General Business Law (new § 352-e-1); Real Property Law (new § 339-ii-1)

Read the draft →
State legislature S20 S39 S40 S19 No sponsor

Everyday Owner Protections Act

Publish the fees, adopt them properly, apply the rules the same way to everyone, answer on a clock.

8 issues reached 5 citations verified 0 corrections 7 open questions

Amends Real Property Law (new sections 339-ll-1 through 339-ll-4); BCL section 501

Read the draft →
State legislature S03 S12 S21 S22 S47 No sponsor

Owner Standing and Enforcement Act

New York already tells boards what they must do. This is how an owner makes them do it.

15 issues reached 9 citations verified 0 corrections 6 open questions

Amends Real Property Law (new sections 339-jj-1 through 339-jj-4)

Read the draft →

All 10 drafts, with the drafting method →

What Albany is actually carrying

Live bills mapped to the mechanisms they deliver, and what each one leaves undone. Bill status is verified against the New York Senate site; the legislative graveyard has the full reintroduction history.

BillSponsorDeliversHow muchWhat it leaves
A.1505 in committee Assemblymember Linda B. RosenthalAssembly Housing S13 Independent annual audit 20% Requires annual financial statements to owners but does not require an independent audit or bar the auditor from other engagements. It does authorize the Attorney General to investigate violations.
A.3701 in committee Assemblymember David Weprin (co-sponsors Carroll, Rosenthal)Assembly Real Property Taxation S43 Assessment and abatement equity 35% Reaches the class-one reclassification question for certain owner-occupied units. Does not reach subsidy accountability, abatement conditions, or the 421-a phase-out cliff.
Int.1120-B enacted Council Majority Leader Amanda C. FariasHousing and Buildings S38 Admissions transparency 40% Local Law 58 of 2026 requires written acknowledgement within 15 days and a decision within 45 days of a complete application, for cooperatives with more than 10 units, effective on or about 2026-07-28. Missing: no written statement of reasons on denial, no cap on what the application package may demand, no limits on reference or interview practice, and no reach beyond the five boroughs.
S.71 in committee Senator Brian KavanaghSenate Judiciary S06 Public managing agent registry 30% The registration statement is filed with the Secretary of State but nothing requires the registry to be public-searchable, and nothing links it to the HPD, DOB, FDNY, or OATH record.
S.8912 / A.10283 reported Senator Shelley B. Mayer (SD 37)Senate Rules S10 Codified board fiduciary duty 35% Bars management company employees from serving on boards unless they are resident shareholders. Missing: a general conflict-of-interest and recusal regime.
S.8912 / A.10283 reported Senator Shelley B. Mayer (SD 37)Senate Rules S12 Owner records access 60% Itemized receipts retained seven years and furnished within five business days on request. Missing: reaches receipts rather than the full records schedule, and carries no per-day penalty or fee-shifting.
S.8912 / A.10283 reported Senator Shelley B. Mayer (SD 37)Senate Rules S16 Owner vote on extraordinary expenses 55% Annual budgets in plain language require shareholder majority approval one month before fiscal year end. Missing: an annual budget vote is not the same as consent to extraordinary expenses arising mid-year, which is what S.5089 reaches.
S.71 in committee Senator Brian KavanaghSenate Judiciary S02 Administrative forum and timelines for enforcement 15% §448(8) provides discipline after notice and hearing and §448(13) grants the Attorney General enforcement power, but neither designates SAPA Article 3 procedure, a timeline, a burden of proof, or an appeal path. This is gaps G12 and G13.
A.1505 in committee Assemblymember Linda B. RosenthalAssembly Housing S12 Owner records access 70% Covers inspection of minutes, financial records, bank statements, bids over $5,000, and code compliance reports within 10 business days. Missing: a per-day penalty and fee-shifting, without which refusal remains costless.
S.8912 / A.10283 reported Senator Shelley B. Mayer (SD 37)Senate Rules S11 Competitive bidding above a threshold 65% Competitive bidding with unredacted bids furnished to directors for non-emergency capital work above $50,000. Missing: bids go to directors, not to owners, and there is no retention or owner-inspection right over the bid file.
S.71 in committee Senator Brian KavanaghSenate Judiciary S05 Managing agent licensure 55% Registration and certification without an examination, bond floor, or E&O floor. The 25-unit aggregate exemption leaves a definable workaround, and the five-year experience grandfather admits operators with an adverse enforcement record.
S.7600 / A.8945 in committee Senator Siela A. Bynoe (SD 6)Senate Judiciary S14 Reserve study and funding plan 80% CORRECTED 2026-07-27: an earlier version of this note said the bill contained no funding requirement. That was wrong. S.7600 requires an association with inadequate reserves to remedy the deficiency within ten fiscal years or the timeframe the study specifies, whichever comes first, with annual increases capped at 10 percent absent board authorization. The real remaining gaps are narrower: no requirement to disclose the reserve funding percentage to owners or to prospective buyers, and an applicability floor of more than $25,000 in total common area capital assets that exempts the smallest associations.
S.8912 / A.10283 reported Senator Shelley B. Mayer (SD 37)Senate Rules S48 Minutes content and distribution standard 80% Minutes to members within 24 hours of approval, and quarterly board meetings. Missing: no content standard for what a minute must record — approval can still precede a minute that says nothing.
S.7745 / A.10286 in committee Senator Shelley B. Mayer (SD 37)Senate Housing, Construction and Community Development S04 Ombudsperson and complaint intake 75% Establishes the ombudsperson program with education, mediation, and alternative dispute resolution, self-funded by a $6 annual per-unit residential fee. Missing: no investigative or disciplinary authority, and no referral pathway to a regulator that does not yet exist. Verified against the bill page 2026-07-27.
S.8912 / A.10283 reported Senator Shelley B. Mayer (SD 37)Senate Rules S54 Owner right to fire the managing agent 85% Provides removal of the management company by majority shareholder vote once sponsor ownership drops below a majority. Missing: the mechanism is limited to cooperative housing corporations and does not reach condominiums.
S.5089 / A.5227 passed one house Senator Luis Sepulveda / Assemblymember Karines ReyesAssembly Housing S16 Owner vote on extraordinary expenses 85% Owner-set expense limits proposed no less than once every five years, with emergency and mortgage-refinancing carve-outs. Missing: nothing material at the mechanism level. The gap is procedural — the bill has now passed the Senate twice, in April 2025 and again in March 2026, and the Assembly same-as A.5227 has not moved out of Housing either time.
S.71 in committee Senator Brian KavanaghSenate Judiciary S49 Fund segregation and bonding 85% §448(11) requires per-association segregated accounts with a misdemeanor penalty. Missing: a bond scaled to funds under management.

Nobody is carrying these

The ten highest-reach mechanisms with no live bill attached. This is the introduction list.

  • S08 Vendor kickback prohibition and conflict disclosure reach 92.3 · viability 63 · 9 issues
  • S15 Pre-contract disclosure package reach 87.1 · viability 73 · 14 issues
  • S09 Facade inspector independence reach 70.4 · viability 55 · 4 issues
  • S18 Sponsor transition reform reach 68.6 · viability 46 · 6 issues
  • S17 Election and proxy integrity standards reach 64.9 · viability 81 · 7 issues
  • S19 Published and justified fee schedule reach 60 · viability 78 · 5 issues
  • S26 Collection legal fee limits reach 54.5 · viability 58 · 3 issues
  • S01 Common Interest Community Division reach 53.9 · viability 57 · 3 issues
  • S46 New construction inspection right reach 53.5 · viability 54 · 2 issues
  • S60 A benchmark for whether a reserve is adequate reach 51.5 · viability 77 · 3 issues

Where other states already did it

The single most useful sentence in a sponsor meeting is that this is not an experiment. Below, verified citations are separated from drafting leads we have not yet checked against primary sources. We do not present the second group as authority.

Verified against primary sources

Colorado
Colo. Rev. Stat. §12-10-801 (Division of Real Estate, art. 10, pt. 8)

Creates the HOA information and resource center within the Division of Real Estate, headed by an HOA information officer, with duties to prepare educational materials, monitor law changes, and publish guidance. The Division registers common interest communities and tracks complaints. Carries a sunset/repeal clause; continued through September 1, 2030 by SB25-184.

maps to S01 Common Interest Community Division · verified 2026-07-27 · New York: ny has nothing
Virginia
Va. Code ch. 23.3 of tit. 54.1; Board established at §54.1-2348, powers and duties at §54.1-2349

Chapter 23.3 (Common Interest Communities) establishes the Common Interest Community Board at §54.1-2348 and gives it authority to "administer and enforce the provisions of this article" at §54.1-2349. CORRECTION: §54.1-2345 is the chapter definitions section and does NOT establish the Board.

maps to S01 Common Interest Community Division · verified 2026-07-27 · New York: ny has nothing
Florida
Fla. Stat. ch. 120, Administrative Procedure Act (DOAH defined at §120.52(5); hearings at §§120.569, 120.57)

The Administrative Procedure Act establishes the Division of Administrative Hearings and the contested-case process in which administrative law judges preside and issue recommended orders. This is the procedural floor that lets professional-licensure violations be adjudicated administratively rather than by civil suit.

maps to S02 Administrative forum and timelines for enforcement · verified 2026-07-27 · New York: ny has a bill
Nevada
Nev. Rev. Stat. §116.625

Creates the Office of the Ombudsman for Owners in Common-Interest Communities and Condominium Hotels. Duties are to assist in processing claims submitted to mediation or arbitration under NRS 38.300–38.360, assist owners in understanding their rights, assist executive boards in carrying out their duties, and where appropriate investigate and assist in resolving disputes. Note: this is an assistance-and-investigation mandate, not a formal complaint-adjudication docket.

maps to S04 Ombudsperson and complaint intake · verified 2026-07-27 · New York: ny has a bill
Florida
Fla. Stat. ch. 468, pt. VIII, "Community Association Management" (§§468.431–468.438); exam requirement at §468.433

Community association manager licensure administered by DBPR. §468.433 provides that "the council shall approve an examination for licensure" demonstrating fundamental knowledge of state and federal community association law, and caps prelicensure education at 24 hours of in-person instruction completed within 12 months before the exam.

maps to S05 Managing agent licensure · verified 2026-07-27 · New York: ny has a bill
Nevada
Nev. Rev. Stat. §116A.620(1)(k)(1)

Requires the management agreement to provide that the community manager or employer "shall maintain insurance covering liability for errors or omissions, professional liability or a surety bond to compensate for losses actionable pursuant to this chapter in an amount of $1,000,000 or more."

maps to S05 Managing agent licensure · verified 2026-07-27 · New York: ny has a bill
Florida
Fla. Stat. ch. 468, pt. VIII (DBPR licensing portal)

Maintains a public community association manager license lookup through the DBPR online services portal. The statutory licensure regime is verified; the public-portal practice is an agency implementation, not a statutory mandate.

maps to S06 Public managing agent registry · verified 2026-06-03 · New York: ny has a bill
California
Cal. Civ. Code §5375

Requires a prospective managing agent to disclose in writing to the board, within 90 days before executing a management agreement, any business or company in which the manager or firm holds ownership interests, profit-sharing arrangements, or other monetary incentives, and whether it receives a referral fee or other monetary benefit from a third-party provider distributing documents. Note: the referral-fee clause is specific to third-party document providers; the broader conflict capture runs through the ownership and profit-sharing clause.

maps to S08 Vendor kickback prohibition and conflict disclosure · verified 2026-07-27 · New York: ny has nothing
California
Cal. Civ. Code §§5200–5240 (Article 5, Record Inspection)

Article 5 of the Association Governance chapter defines "association records," "enhanced association records," and "association election materials," and governs member inspection. §5200 is the definitions section that opens the article.

maps to S12 Owner records access · verified 2026-07-27 · New York: ny has a bill
Florida
Fla. Stat. §718.111(12)

The official records subsection: sets what records an association must maintain from inception, retention periods, unit owner inspection rights, and accessibility requirements.

maps to S12 Owner records access · verified 2026-07-27 · New York: ny has a bill
Florida
Fla. Stat. §718.111(13)

Sets financial reporting tiers by ANNUAL REVENUE, not by unit count: under $150,000 cash receipts and expenditures; $150,000–$299,999 compiled; $300,000–$499,999 reviewed; $500,000 and above audited financial statements, due within 90 days after fiscal year end.

maps to S13 Independent annual audit · verified 2026-07-27 · New York: ny has a bill
California
Cal. Civ. Code §§5550–5580 (Article 3, Reserve Planning)

§5550(a) requires the board to cause a visual inspection for reserve study purposes at least once every three years where the replacement value of major components exceeds one-half of gross budget, to review the study annually, and to adopt a funding plan. Note: California does not require the study be performed by a credentialed specialist.

maps to S14 Reserve study and funding plan · verified 2026-07-27 · New York: ny has a bill
Nevada
Nev. Rev. Stat. §116A.420

Prohibits acting as a reserve study specialist without registering with the Division, directs the Commission to adopt standards of practice, and authorizes investigation and discipline. This is the credentialing precedent for a reserve-study mandate.

maps to S14 Reserve study and funding plan · verified 2026-07-27 · New York: ny has a bill
Florida
Fla. Stat. §718.503

Imposes disclosure obligations on both developers and non-developer resale sellers. A developer contract is voidable and may be terminated within 15 days after the buyer receives all required documents; a resale contract is voidable by written notice within 7 days. Both periods exclude weekends and legal holidays and terminate at closing.

maps to S15 Pre-contract disclosure package · verified 2026-07-27 · New York: ny has nothing
California
Cal. Civ. Code §§5100–5145 (Article 4, Member Election); inspector requirement at §5110

§5100 requires director elections, assessment votes, and governing-document amendments to be held by secret ballot. §5110 requires the association to "select an independent third party or parties as an inspector of elections" and bars any person "currently employed or under contract to the association for any compensable services other than serving as an inspector" — which reaches the managing agent — as well as directors, candidates, and their relatives.

maps to S17 Election and proxy integrity standards · verified 2026-07-27 · New York: ny has nothing

Not independently verified

Recorded so the research is reproducible. Treat every line below as a pointer to check, not as a citation to rely on.

Illinois
765 ILCS 605/19 (Illinois Condominium Property Act §19)

Requires the board to maintain enumerated records; a member may inspect on written request stating with particularity the records sought; failure to make records available within 10 BUSINESS DAYS is deemed a denial; a member who prevails in an enforcement action recovers reasonable attorney fees and costs. NOTE: ilga.gov section URLs returned 404 on 2026-07-27; consistent across Justia, onecle, FindLaw and practitioner sources. Re-verify against ilga.gov before any legislator-facing use.

maps to S12 Owner records access · disputed

The citation register

On 2026-07-27 every citation in this model was run against its primary source. This is the ledger of what that found. It is published rather than filed because a model that cannot show which of its citations were actually read is asking to be trusted rather than checked.

63NY cites verified
15peer-state cites verified
9bills verified
4designations already in use
6citations retired

Read against the primary source

13 NYCRR Part 20 AG Real Estate Finance Bureau — newly constructed, vacant or non-residential condominiums

Department of Law regulations governing offerings of cooperative interests in realty. Escrow requirements at §20.3. Under Parts 18 through 25 an offeror is required to periodically amend a Plan — which is the existing authority an amendment docket would publish against.

13 NYCRR §20.3 Offering plan contents — required cover legend

Requires the offering plan cover to state that "FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF LAW DOES NOT MEAN THAT THE DEPARTMENT OR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCY HAS APPROVED THIS." Acceptance for filing is not approval; the Martin Act is a disclosure statute and the Department of Law does not review the merits or the adequacy of any fund.

13 NYCRR §23.3 Offering plan disclosure — reserve fund compliance

Subdivision (ac)(1) through (6) sets the disclosures a sponsor must make regarding compliance with the NYC Reserve Fund Law. Identified in the AG REFB guidance memorandum of 2015-05-04 as the governing disclosure provision; the subdivision text itself was not read.

34 RCNY ch. 7 Revocable consents (DOT)

A revocable consent is required for any vault extending beyond the sidewalk or curbstone line. Plan requirements at 34 RCNY §7-07; filing fees at §7-08; consents generally granted for renewable ten-year terms. Vault rules also appear at 34 RCNY §2-13. Replaces the bare "RCNY Title 34" placeholder.

9 NYCRR Part 1700 HCR Mitchell-Lama regulations

DHCR/HCR Mitchell-Lama regulations at Part 1700 et seq. A dissolution process already exists: a Notice of Intent filed with HCR, then a Notice of Public Meeting served by door delivery to each tenant no earlier than 90 days before the anticipated dissolution date, a meeting held 10 to 20 days after that notice and at least 60 days before dissolution, and a bar on charging tenants the costs of compliance. Replaces the bare "9 NYCRR" placeholder.

BCL §501 Authorized shares

MATERIAL FINDING: contains a dedicated residential cooperative provision permitting variation in transfer fees and charges among shares of the same class without rendering them unequal, provided liquidation rights are substantially equal per share, maintenance charges are fixed equally, and voting is either per-share or one-vote-per-unit. This is the statutory authorization basis a flip tax must rest on.

BCL §624 Books and records; right of inspection, prima facie evidence

Shareholder inspection of minutes and record of shareholders on at least five days written demand.

BCL §717 Duty of directors

Good faith and the care an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use. The provision a codified fiduciary duty would amend.

BCL §722 Authorization for indemnification of directors and officers

Indemnification is already conditioned on having acted in good faith for a purpose reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the corporation. Confirms the S53 objection answer: the good-faith condition is existing law, not a new imposition.

BCL §726 Insurance for indemnification of directors and officers

Authorizes purchase of D&O insurance subject to restrictions.

CPLR 3215 Default judgment

Requires proof of service, proof of the facts constituting the claim by affidavit (or a verified complaint), and proof of default. Additional-notice requirement: before default against a natural person on a contractual obligation, the plaintiff must mail a further copy of the summons to the residence at least 20 days beforehand. Consumer and medical debt claims by a non-original creditor require chain-of-title affidavits.

CPLR 4503 Attorney

The attorney-client privilege provision. Contains a personal-representative/beneficiary provision at 4503(a)(2) but NO exception for a corporation's own shareholders or members — which is precisely the gap a codified fiduciary exception would fill.

CPLR Article 75 Arbitration (§§7501–7516)

MATERIAL FINDING: §7515 is already titled "Mandatory arbitration clauses; prohibited." New York has therefore already legislated a prohibition on pre-dispute mandatory arbitration in another context, which makes extending the principle to common interest community governing documents an extension of settled state policy rather than a novel step.

Cal. Civ. Code §5100 et seq. Member Election, §§5100–5145

Verified in jurisdiction_precedents on 2026-07-27; inspector requirement pinned to §5110.

Cal. Civ. Code §5200 et seq. Record Inspection, §§5200–5240

Verified in jurisdiction_precedents on 2026-07-27.

Cal. Civ. Code §5375 Managing agent disclosure

Verified in jurisdiction_precedents on 2026-07-27 via leginfo.legislature.ca.gov.

Cal. Civ. Code §5550 Reserve Planning, §§5550–5580

Verified in jurisdiction_precedents on 2026-07-27. Three-year visual inspection cycle; no credentialing requirement.

Civil Rights Law §70-a Actions involving public petition and participation; recovery of damages

Costs and attorney fees recoverable on a demonstration that the action was commenced or continued without a substantial basis in fact and law. Conditional, not automatic.

Civil Rights Law §76-a Actions involving public petition and participation; definitions

Covers any communication in a public forum in connection with an issue of public interest, and other lawful conduct in furtherance of free speech or petition. Damages require clear and convincing evidence of knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard.

Fla. Stat. §718.112 Bylaws — condominium board member certification

Requires each newly elected or appointed director to complete an approved educational course of at least four hours AND to certify in writing to the association secretary that they have read the declaration, articles, bylaws and current written policies, will uphold them, and will faithfully discharge their fiduciary responsibility — within one year before, or 90 days after, election or appointment. A director who misses the deadline is suspended from the board until compliant.

GBL Art. 36-B Warranties On Sales of New Homes (§§777–777-b); §777 is Definitions

MATERIAL FINDING: the housing merchant implied warranty applies to a single family house or a for-sale unit in a multi-unit residential structure "of five stories or less." Most of the NYC condominium market is therefore outside it entirely. §777 itself is the definitions section, not the warranty grant.

GBL §352-e Real estate syndication offerings

The Attorney General offering-plan filing requirement. Expressly reaches cooperative interests in realty and condominiums, and expressly reaches amendments at subdivisions 6(a) and 7(a) — which is what makes an amendment docket administrable under existing authority.

HMC §§27-2097, 27-2098 Registration; time to file, and registration statement contents

MATERIAL FINDING: New York City already operates an annual property registration keyed to the building, due each September 1 and on any change of ownership or managing agent, and it REQUIRES designation of a managing agent with a successor designation within eight days of the agent's death, incapacity or disqualification. Penalties raised by Local Law 71 of 2023: $500–$1,500 for five units or fewer, $1,000–$5,000 above five. This is a working precedent for a statewide registry. Replaces the "HPD registration rules" placeholder.

Insurance Law Art. 34 Insurance Contracts — property/casualty (62 sections)

Governs property and casualty contracts including cancellation and nonrenewal. Personal lines at §3425; commercial lines at §3426; cancellation procedure and premium return at §3428. A condominium or cooperative master policy is a commercial line, so §3426 is the operative hook.

Insurance Law §3426 Commercial lines — cancellation and renewal

The commercial-lines cancellation and nonrenewal provision within Article 34. Pinned from the Article 34 section list; the section text itself has not been read individually.

Judiciary Law §487 Misconduct by attorneys

Deceit or collusion with intent to deceive the court or any party, willful delay of a client suit for personal gain, or wrongfully receiving money. Treble damages to the injured party. Attorneys only.

Labor Law §740 Retaliatory action by employers; prohibition

The whistleblower statute. Reaches employees, former employees, and natural persons employed as independent contractors. Good drafting template for the employee limb of a whistleblower provision — it does not reach board members or unit owners.

NYC Admin Code Title 28 Administrative Code — Construction Codes

Umbrella. Sections §28-301.1, §28-301.1.1, §28-302, §28-304, §28-318 and §28-320 within it are individually verified below.

NYC Admin Code §19-152 Duties and obligations of property owner with respect to sidewalks and lots

Owners are responsible for maintaining, repairing and replacing the adjacent sidewalk. Where the sidewalk is built over a vault, cellar extension, or other underground structure connected to the property, repair responsibility falls entirely on the owner and the city does not repair. Owner cost liability is limited to the defective flags the department orders repaired.

NYC Admin Code §20-610 Certification of powered mobility devices and storage batteries (Local Law 39 of 2023)

Effective 2023-09-16. Battery-powered micromobility devices and their batteries must be certified to accredited laboratory safety standards to be sold, leased or rented in the city, with certification displayed on the device, packaging or documentation. Enforced by DCWP with FDNY. Replaces the unconfirmed §15-131 citation previously used in this model.

NYC Admin Code §26-701 Cooperative and Condominium Conversions (ch. 8 of tit. 26) — the Reserve Fund Law

Local Law 70 of 1982. Applies to landlords in New York City converting buildings with residential units to condominium or cooperative ownership. HPD is the agency charged with oversight. Violations carry civil and criminal sanctions, and the Attorney General has sought injunctive and monetary relief against sponsors violating plan representations of compliance.

NYC Admin Code §26-703 Establishment of reserve fund

Within 30 days after the closing of a conversion pursuant to an offering plan, the offeror must establish and transfer to the cooperative corporation or condominium board a reserve fund for capital repairs, replacements and improvements. Two funding methods: 3% of total price funded within 30 days of the first residential closing, or a 1% mandatory initial contribution plus supplemental contributions at 3% of actual sales price over five years. Superintendent unit, ancillary spaces and non-residential units may be excluded from total price. §26-703(d) permits an exemption, on application to HPD, for buildings completed within three years before conversion. CRITICAL: per AG guidance, "A working capital fund, which may be established by a sponsor, is not a reserve fund."

NYC Admin Code §27-2004 Definitions (Housing Maintenance Code)

Housing Maintenance Code definitions including dwelling, family, multiple dwelling, owner and tenant. Correct target for a structure-based redefinition of the regulated unit.

NYC Admin Code §28-301.1 Owner's responsibilities

General duty to maintain buildings and service equipment in safe and code-compliant condition and to report dangerous conditions in writing. NOTE: this section does NOT contain the parapet requirement — see §28-301.1.1.

Added by Local Law 126 of 2021, effective 2022-11-07, with annual parapet observation required from 2024-01-01. Applies to all buildings with parapets fronting a public right-of-way regardless of height, excepting fully detached one- and two-family homes and buildings with a barrier preventing access to the exterior wall. Observation reports retained six years under 1 RCNY §103-15. CORRECTION: this model previously cited §28-301.1 for parapets, which is the general owner-responsibility section.

NYC Admin Code §28-302 Maintenance of exterior walls (Facade Inspection Safety Program)

Applies to buildings greater than six stories. Critical examination of exterior walls and appurtenances at intervals set by rule but at least once every five years, filed by a licensed architect or engineer (QEWI). Unsafe conditions to be corrected within 30 days of filing.

NYC Admin Code §28-304 Periodic inspection of elevators

Inspection and testing per the schedule in Table N1 of ASME A17.1 as referenced in the Building Code, exempting owner-occupied residential elevators and those in convents and rectories not open to the public. Chair lifts at intervals not exceeding one year. Defects corrected within 45 days of filing, except hazardous conditions requiring immediate correction. NOTE: nothing here measures or reports OUTAGE DURATION, which is the gap S28 addresses.

NYC Admin Code §28-318 Periodic inspection of gas piping systems

Local Law 152 of 2016, effective 2020. Four-year inspection cycle by a licensed master plumber or a registered journeyman under direct and continuing LMP supervision. Applies to all buildings except one- and two-family homes and Occupancy Group R-3. Scope covers exposed gas lines from point of entry through building service meters up to tenant spaces, plus combustible-gas testing of public spaces, hallways, corridors, mechanical and boiler rooms.

NYC Admin Code §28-320 Greenhouse gas emissions limits (Local Law 97)

Codified at §28-320 and §28-321. Covers buildings over 25,000 gross square feet, two or more buildings on the same tax lot together over 50,000, OR — directly relevant here — two or more buildings held in the CONDOMINIUM form governed by the same board of managers together exceeding 50,000. First compliance period 2024, reporting and penalties from 2025-05-01, at $268 per ton of CO2 equivalent over the limit. Limits tighten every five years.

NYC Admin Code §§26-3101, 26-3201 et seq. Short-term rental registration (ch. 31) and platform verification and reporting (ch. 32)

Local Law 18 of 2022, enacted 2022-01-09, enforcement from 2023-09-05. Chapter 31 (§§26-3101–26-3105) requires hosts to register with the Mayor's Office of Special Enforcement; Chapter 32 (§§26-3201–26-3203) imposes verification and reporting duties on booking platforms. Chapter 32 is the platform-side hook a cost-reallocation provision would attach to.

NYC Local Law 58 of 2026 Co-op Application Review Timelines

Verified in the bills table on 2026-07-27. Enacted 2026-01-29, effective on or about 2026-07-28.

Nev. Rev. Stat. §116A.420 Reserve study specialists — registration

Prohibits acting as a reserve study specialist without registering with the Division; the Commission adopts standards of practice by regulation; the Division may investigate and discipline. Exceptions for association board members and officers acting in their official capacity.

PHFL Article 2 Limited-profit Housing Companies (Mitchell-Lama)

The Mitchell-Lama article. §35 Voluntary dissolution; §35-A Requirements regarding dissolution; §36 Sale of project prior to termination of tax exemption.

PHFL Article XI Housing Development Fund Companies (§§570–582)

Authorizes HDFCs. Tax exemptions at §577; regulatory agreements at §576; incorporation at §573.

Verified UNUSED by complete enumeration of RPL articles on 2026-07-27: the Article 9 family runs 9-A, 9-B, 9-C, 9-D, 9-E and then jumps to Article 10. 9-F is the next available letter. This is a drafting placeholder, not an enacted designation.

RPAPL Article 7-A Special Proceedings By Tenants ... For Judgment Directing Deposit of Rents and the Use Thereof For the Purpose of Remedying Conditions Dangerous to Life, Health or Safety (§§769-783)

Tenant-side receivership. §770 grounds; §776 judgment; §778 appointment of administrator; §781 "Owner" defined; §782 "Dwelling" defined. Applies in New York City and Nassau, Suffolk, Rockland and Westchester counties. NOTE: whether the §781/§782 definitions reach a condominium or cooperative was NOT confirmed — that unresolved question is precisely the gap S56 proposes to close.

RPL Art. 9-B Condominium act (§§339-d–339-ll)

The Condominium Act. Confirms the article all §339-series targets sit in.

RPL §339-e Definitions

Condominium Act definitions: building, capital replacement, common charges, common elements, common expenses, common interest, common profits, declaration, majority, operation of the property, person, property, qualified leasehold condominium, unit, unit designation, unit owner. NOTE: it does NOT separately define "limited common elements" — which is the definitional gap issue 64 turns on.

RPL §339-i Common elements

Establishes four alternative methods for setting each unit's common interest percentage (fair value, floor area, equal percentages, floor space plus factors), bars alteration without the consent of all affected owners, and bars separation of the interest from its unit.

RPL §339-m Common profits and expenses

Apportionment by common interest, but the board may specially allocate to non-residential units, apportion by special or exclusive use of particular units or common areas, and charge reduced common expenses to income-restricted affordable units. Special allocation arrangements must be disclosed in the offering plan. This special-allocation power is the lever behind the limited-common-element reclassification pattern.

RPL §339-v Contents of by-laws

Governs mandatory and optional bylaw provisions: board of managers, meetings, officers, financial management, use restrictions. Correct target for bylaw-adoption mechanisms.

RPL §339-w Books of receipts and expenditures; availability for examination

Requires detailed chronological records of receipts and expenditures plus vouchers, available for examination by unit owners "at convenient hours of weekdays," with an annual written summary. Specifies NO format and NO electronic delivery — this is the primary source that confirms issue 81.

RPL §339-z Lien for common charges; priority; exoneration of grantor and grantee

Board lien for unpaid common charges plus interest, subordinate only to tax liens, first mortgages of record, and specified government subordinate mortgages. The board must furnish a statement of unpaid common charges, and neither grantor nor grantee is liable beyond the amount stated.

RPTL §1802 Classification of real property (assessment classes)

The classification provision A.3701 amends to move certain owner-occupied cooperative and condominium units into class one.

RPTL §421-a Affordable New York Housing Program

Tax exemption for new multiple dwellings in a city of one million or more, with affordability conditions — certain provisions require not less than twenty percent of units to meet specified income thresholds, with compliance required throughout the exemption period.

RPTL §467-a Partial tax abatement for residential real property held in the cooperative or condominium form of ownership in a city having a population of one million or more

The co-op/condo abatement, created in 1996 to reduce the disparity against comparably valued one-to-three-family homes. Reduces annual property taxes by 17.5 to 28.1 percent depending on average unit assessed value; applies to Class 2 co-op and condo property. Replaces the unconfirmed NYC Admin Code §11-245 citation previously used in this model.

RPTL §581 Assessment of residential cooperative, condominium and rental property

Caps the assessment of a co-op or condo parcel at what it would be assessed if NOT held in that form. Subdivision 3 separately bars assessing rental property as if converted. NOTE: this is an assessment-parity rule; the comparable-rental valuation is New York City's implementation of it, not the section's own text.

S.5089 / A.5227 Right Against Extraordinary Expenses

Verified in the bills table on 2026-07-27. Passed the Senate twice; Assembly same-as pending.

S.7600 / A.8945 Capital Reserve Study Mandate

Verified in the bills table on 2026-07-27. CAUTION: A.8945 files with the State Comptroller, S.7600 with the Attorney General; same-as status unconfirmed.

S.8912 / A.10283 Cooperative Housing Corporation Transparency (Mayer)

Verified in the bills table 2026-07-27. Passed Senate Corporations 6-1 on 2026-05-19; committed to Rules 2026-06-05.

SAPA Article 3 Adjudicatory Proceedings (§§301–308)

Sections: 301 Hearings, 302 Record, 303 Presiding officers, 304 Powers of presiding officers, 305 Disclosure, 306 Evidence, 307 Decisions determinations and orders, 308 Streamlined optional adjudicatory proceedings for small businesses. This is the correct designation for a forum grant.

A model act of the Uniform Law Commission. The 1982 version was adopted by Alaska, Colorado, Minnesota, Nevada and West Virginia; the 2008 version by Connecticut, Delaware, Vermont and Washington. New York does not appear among the adopting states in the sources reviewed. NOTE: New York's non-adoption is an absence in the sources consulted rather than an affirmative statement by any source, and should be confirmed against the Uniform Law Commission enactment map before public use.

Where an attorney represents a personal representative such as an executor or trustee, beneficiaries are not automatically treated as clients and the fiduciary relationship does not automatically waive privilege. This is the existing New York carve-out that an association fiduciary exception would be modelled on — a narrow, verified analogue rather than an appeal to unstated doctrine.

Designations already in use — do not propose these

A drafting model that proposes an article number the legislature has already spent is a model nobody in a counsel's office will read twice. This section exists because we made exactly that mistake.

RPL Art. 12-D Short-term rental units (§§447-a–447-g)

Currently occupied by the short-term rental sections. S.71 nonetheless states that it adds Article 12-D §448, which would append to this article. Recorded as the bill states it.

RPL Art. 9-C Solar rights act (§342)

DO NOT PROPOSE. This designation is taken. The model originally targeted a "new RPL Article 9-C" for fourteen solutions; corrected to 9-F on 2026-07-27.

RPL Art. 9-D Electric Vehicle Rights Act

DO NOT PROPOSE. Taken.

RPL Art. 9-E Conveyance and Encumbrance of Manufactured Homes As Real Property

DO NOT PROPOSE. Taken.

Retired — wrong, vague, or never a citation at all

Each of these was cited by an earlier version of this model and has been replaced. They are kept on the record, rather than quietly deleted, so that a wrong citation cannot drift back in later. A build check fails if any solution references one of them.

  • 9 NYCRRRETIRED. An entire title is not a citation. Replaced with 9 NYCRR Part 1700 on 2026-07-27.
  • HPD registration rulesRETIRED. Never a citation — placeholder text. Replaced with HMC §§27-2097, 27-2098 on 2026-07-27.
  • NYC Admin Code §11-245RETIRED. Could not be confirmed. The Title 11 Chapter 2 exemptions part lists §§11-241 through 11-245.9 in its contents, but no heading or text for §11-245 was retrievable, and the co-op/condo abatement is actually RPTL §467-a. All uses in this model were replaced with RPTL §467-a on 2026-07-27. Do not reintroduce without reading the section.
  • NYC Admin Code §15-131RETIRED. Title 15 is the Fire Department title; the device-certification mandate is at §20-610 under Local Law 39 of 2023. Replaced on 2026-07-27. If an FDNY storage or charging rule is needed, cite the FDNY rule directly rather than this section.
  • RCNY Title 34RETIRED. An entire title is not a citation. Replaced with 34 RCNY ch. 7 on 2026-07-27.
  • fiduciary exception doctrineRETIRED as a citation. A doctrine reference, not authority. Replaced on 2026-07-27 with the verified statutory analogue at CPLR 4503(a)(2). The exception is settled in analogous trust and corporate contexts but is NOT codified in New York for common interest communities — which is the gap S22 addresses. Never present as existing New York authority.

How these numbers are made, and what they are not

What is measured

Reach is derived. It is computed from the coverage matrix: the severity of every issue a mechanism touches, multiplied by how much of that issue the mechanism actually closes, plus owner visibility and the strength of our documentation. The severities come from the issue catalog; the coverage weights are stated for each of the 201 links and each carries a written rationale.

What is judgment

Viability, opposition intensity, preemption risk, and litigation risk are analyst estimates on a documented 1-to-5 scale. They are editorial. Every metric row in the database records metric_basis = analyst_estimate and a note explaining the score. We would rather show the reasoning and be argued with than present judgment as measurement.

What is checked

Fifty-seven integrity checks run before this page can be rebuilt: no issue without a fix, exactly one headline fix per issue, no cycle in the prerequisite graph, no package sequenced ahead of its dependencies, no citation marked verified without a date and a method, no partial fix that fails to name its residual gap. The export refuses to write if any check fails.

What we do not assert

Opposition is recorded at the level of an industry or a practice, never as a position attributed to a named organization. Attributing a stance to a specific group requires a sourced statement from that group, and where we do not have one we do not make one up. Of our 16 peer-state citations, 15 are primary-source verified and 1 carries a caveat you can read. All 63 New York statutory targets have been read against the source, and the 6 citations an earlier draft got wrong are listed by name in the citation register rather than deleted.

Model generated 2026-07-29 · schema v1.0 · 61 mechanisms · 201 coverage links · 65 dependency edges · validator: 56 pass, 0 fail